Tag: Personal Growth

  • ¿Truths? Part 5

    Dave’s ¿Truths?

    CogDiss01As noted with ¿Truths? Part 1, I am choosing to offer these thoughts simply to encourage growth. I submit them simply for self-study as an example of one person’s searching — such self-study is a very powerful way to come to know yourself. The list of these truths is long and I will submit it over a number of blogs, 25-30 brief statements per posting.

    As previously noted, a comment on language: I am not an advocate of scientific materialism, the philosophic ontology that only science can address truth, and that energy-matter is the only domain of experience in the universe. I value scientific methodology highly, but the overall terminology of scientific materialism has many hidden presuppositions. As much as possible, I will identify them in these posts.

    (107 — continuing from previous) Some actions are more useful than others. They distinguish effectiveness from purity.

    (108) Frequently, effectiveness and purity do not coincide. Do I want purity, or do I want effectiveness?

    If what I get is recurrent pain, somehow I am contributing, somehow I am wanting purity.

    (109) The mind is a pattern generator—a generator of behavior that becomes patterned behavior (habit and/or stuckness).

    Purity is often pattern!

     (110) I need to be careful of what I am choosing—I may get what I ask for!

    Do I really want this outcome? I have known people to tell others “Drop dead!”¾and they have!

    (111) I have a center, a place within myself, or a way of being where I am most stable, at peace and ready to be in action.

    I can learn to be centered.

    (112) Learning to be centered necessitates three things:

    • developing a vision of who I am and where I want to go with my life, something greater than myself to which I am committed.
    • developing discipline in my life.
    • planning—keeping track of what I need to do on a daily basis, balanced with a philosophy of “just do it!”

    (113) The meaning of life, being centered in life, always points to or is directed to something or someone other than self; strict orientation to self does not appear to be an effective stance.

    This stance of being centered can be through creative contribution (achievement), exploration of relationship (affiliation) or by acceptance of unavoidable pain (the inward journey of freedom).

    (114) To live is to have pain (sometimes); to live well is to find meaning in the pain.

    Life ultimately asks that I take responsibility to find the answers to its problems, and to fulfill the tasks it repeatedly sets for me, for each and every individual. These tasks differ from individual to individual, and from moment to moment for the same individual.

    (115) The word ‘self’ is frequently misunderstood; the word actually has many meanings, often derogatory.

    The suffix ‘-ish’ refers to ‘having the characteristic of.’ How is it that ‘selfish’ is so derogatory?

    (116) True selfishness means to be centered, to have the characteristics of a self!

    However, such a state threatens others (and becomes ‘Don’t be so selfish!’), a focus on the other, the crab box (see #18).

    (117) Meaning provides reasons; actions provide results.

    (118) I am most centered when I am complete with the actions that I want to do, the actions that are effective, the actions that lead me to a sense of health and resolution of the tasks I have set myself.

    (119) Invariably, this includes my environment. I am not ‘independent,’ nor am I a parasite on others.

    I am dependent on my world in many ways though. And I need to be aware of the consequences of my choices.

    (120) When I avoid my own need for action, I lose my center. Completeness does not mean that I have no issues that trouble me—it means I am at peace with my own actions.

    (121) A friend of mine wants his tombstone to read “He couldn’t do everything—so he did something!”

    (122) Progress in my life requires a balance of actions, those from myself and those from others. Completeness means that I am awaiting action from others.

    I seek completeness.

    (123) Some issues/conflicts of my life are more important than others. Conflicts trouble me when:

    • I am in internal struggle with myself (my “shoulds”), or
    • I am in external struggle with others (their “shoulds”).

    (124) My “shoulds” present major issues for me, and I seek resolution; they are important to me.

    The “shoulds” of others require that I delimit myself; I have the right and the responsibility to agree or to disagree—and to be at peace with my actions.

    (125) As much as possible, I transform my “shoulds” into choices based on how I would manage the worst possible outcome of “Will I?” or “Won’t I?”

    If I am willing to accept the risk of the worst case, I can always manage whatever outcome occurs. If neither option generates anxiety, I choose on the basis of what is the best that will happen.

    (126) I also have a dark side, a part of me that I do not know well, and frequently do not wish to know well—lazy and arrogant amongst other characteristics.

    Frequently my dark side is my most creative part. A big component of the second half of life is to learn from, and come to terms with, my dark side.

    (127) Fish swim in the ocean; I swim in language!

    Language provides the basis of giving meaning to my awareness and of being in action, of interacting with others.

    (128) The discipline of monitoring my own language, of what I am actually voicing, is an incredibly powerful discipline.

    (129) More and more, I recognize that I can only language in metaphor, an implied comparison with the intention to create meaning.

    My best use of language is to strive for you (or me, in my self talk)¾the listener¾to have a detailed sensory experience of the meaning I am intending, either by telling you my actual experience as it happened, or by creating a metaphor with similar effect.

    (130) Telling you my conclusions, rather than my experience, is fraught with difficulty.

    It is very possible you will argue with my conclusions.

    People seldom argue when told of experience.

    (131) Language most likely developed as a process for cooperative behavior. Essentially by definition, cooperative refers to non-innate behavior, behavior that requires some form of future intent, and some form of self-conscious choice.

    Given that we humans remain creatures of habit, most cooperation occurs via some form of ritual, some form of stylized agreed-upon habit.

    (132) Once a culture or a species can generate language, the possibility of non-genetic inheritance (memetic) becomes an actuality; we call it tradition! enforced usually by ritual!

    This inheritance may also be multi-dimensional, through time and space, to friends and neighbors, rather than simply thru time to our children.

    Genes and memes: memes likely are transmission processes unique to our species.

    (133) This form of inheritance (via memes) is extremely powerful.

    Witness the furor of the Irelands over centuries,  the devastation of Bosnia-Serbia, the terrorism of the 21st century. Consider also the influence of the family, where both genetic and cultural transmission occur!

    (134) Changing my language may radically change my life!!

    To be continued.

  • ¿Truths? Part 4

    Dave’s ¿Truths?

    Truth3As noted with ¿Truths? Part 1, I am choosing to offer these thoughts simply to encourage growth. I submit them simply for self-study as an example of one person’s searching — such self-study is a very powerful way to come to know yourself. The list of these truths is long and I will submit it over a number of blogs, 25-30 brief statements per posting.

    As previously noted, a comment on language: I am not an advocate of scientific materialism, the philosophic ontology that only science can address truth, and that energy-matter is the only domain of experience in the universe. I value scientific methodology highly, but the overall terminology of scientific materialism has many hidden presuppositions. As much as possible, I will identify them in these posts.

    [An apology also — sometimes the formatting offered by WordPress is very limiting! An aspect of technology that I hate is that it forces me into processes that I do not want in my life; yet the same technology offers many advantages. Thus my common statement: Technology is wonderful — when it works.]

    (80 — continuing from previous) Reactivity is a habit! And like all habits, sustained by laziness!

    (81) I cannot solve life’s problems except by solving them.

    I alone am 100% responsible for everything that I feel, think, and do! People may stir my pot or push my buttons, but I provide the pot and the buttons.

    Personal freedom has to do with having many choices, acting on those choices, and dealing with the consequences.

    (82) Awareness is essential! My “attention to my ongoing spontaneous sensations and perceptions” is fundamental (and may be developed through discipline).

    The more grounded I am in Now, the more choice I have. When I distinguish between my perceptions, and how I interpret these perceptions (my story), the more choice I have.

    This is the basis of personal freedom (and of power and strength).

    (83) My awareness is often rapid and fleeting, just barely within consciousness.

    This is especially true of those perceptions that I wish to avoid, those that are painful to confront.

    (84) “The Rules” (the social constraints as to how I and you should be) are generally out-of-consciousness. They are so familiar, and so pervasive, that it is simpler to keep them out-of-consciousness; then we can be ‘good little boys and girls,’ approved of by others, especially our parents.

    (85) Two of the major rules are:

    • ‘don’t talk about the rules—keep them out-of-consciousness’ and
    • ‘your rules are the same as my rules.’

    (86) These keep me safe — and keep life complex.

    I learned these rules as a small child, asking questions when others were uncomfortable or anxious. Rather than acknowledge their discomfort, they criticized me and, in my pain, I learned not to speak about the rules. Eventually I learned not to think about the rules.

    I also had to assume that each one of us obeys the same set of rules. It was the only way for me to make sense of my world.

    Then it seemed like I could avoid the pain. And I could for a while.

    (87) A major difficulty however occurrs when I moved out of my family of origin, into another family of my own creation. And I assume that everybody had the same rule!

    Not a good assumption! My partner has a different set of rules, also in the other-than-conscious domain. So we fight, and wonder what is happening, but we can’t talk about the rules. That breaks the rules!

    The consequence is called Guilt!

    (88) Guilt is useful for about ten (10) minutes.

    Guilt is the meaning/energy I give to an issue when I break the rules.

    If the rules are out-of-consciousness and I cannot talk about them, I have created a problem for myself.

    (89) If I am guilty, then I am attempting to give myself a message about a problem, usually about a belief of mine that I am bypassing.

    I have broken some rule as to how I ‘should’ act.

    (90) The rule is out-of-conscious, likely because I hold it as a ‘should’ rather than a ‘want.’

    My growth work is to hear the message, and decide if I want to attend to it or not. If not, I need to resolve my guilt; if so, I need to be in action!

    (91) As with ‘guilt,’ so the above is applicable to ‘embarrassment,’ ‘resentment’ and ‘rebellion’—they are useful for about 10 minutes.

    I am ‘embarrassed’ when I assume you will criticize me for breaking the rules. And, after all, you have the same rules as I do! So you know when I am breaking the rules!

    I ‘resent’ you when you break the rules, my rules, and I am unable to talk about the rules. And, after all, you have the same rules as I do! Don’t we?

    I ‘rebel’ when you attempt to impose your ‘rules’ on me, rules I don’t want to acknowledge, because we cannot talk about them. That breaks the rules!

    (92) I ‘shame’ myself when, in addition to being trapped in breaking the rule,  I consider that I am also bad for breaking the rule.

    (93) If you want to be a slave, harbor your resentments and your guilt.

    They bind you to your out-of-conscious rules. Such crazy rules!

    (94) I have a set of tools for solving problems; they are called actions. My disciplines are also actions. Depending on the stresses in my life, I need different tools at different times.

    (95) I can only solve problems through actions! I can act my way into a new way of thinking; usually I cannot think my way into a new way of acting.

    Interaction with life involves risk! There is no risk in thinking; thinking does not mobilize action. Intention mobilizes action!

    (96) Actions speak louder than words; they are also more truthful!

    (97) I have a body! I use my body to be in action. It is the only body I have, or will have. I need/want to keep it healthy.

    More than anything else, health involves intelligent attention to good nutrition, regular exercise, and effective responses.

    (98) I use my body as my source of information.

    All biological organisms are designed to receive information (awareness—sensation through sensory systems) and act on that information (action—response through motor systems). All information comes to my mind from my body (perhaps!? — consciousness is very complex, probably more than my simple body).

    (99) Given that I am a spiritual being, it is probable that there are other sources of information. However, in the complexity of our modern materialistic world, it is difficult to determine what these other sources might be, or to access them in reliable ways.

    My body is my best starting point.

    (100) My body (body-mind-heart-soul-spirit) is a vast system of communicative networks, responding to demand. Three systems predominate:

    • Neurological: electro-chemical orientation, an organizing neuronal/humoral network (uni-cellular), encoding information, responding in milliseconds to seconds. Principally responsible for temporal consciousness and memory.
    • Cardiovascular: fluid pressure orientation, a distributive network (multi-cellular), transferring information/resources, responding in seconds to days. Principally responsible for ??? (¿felt sense—emotionality or spiritual?).
    • Myofascial: mechanical piezo-electrical orientation, a structural network (extracellular), allowing movement within the exo-system, responding in days to years. Principally, it seems to be responsible for energetic consciousness and memory.

    (101) The purpose of my mind is to be a delay loop between awareness and action! Almost always, when I am suffering, I am stuck in the delay loop.

    (102) The system (me) is well-designed—not omnipotent, just well-designed.

    (103) The system is so well-designed that almost always my body knows my truths, and what actions are appropriate.

    Usually this occurs  long before I am ready to acknowledge this information consciously.

    (104) Action clears the delay loop for new information, and new possibility.

    (105) Action can be specific (this is what I need to do—so just do it!) or it can be non-specific discharge (exaggeration, role play, anger discharge in safety, etc.).

    Both satisfy the system. (This is one of the fundamental distinctions of my Blowing Out work.)

    (106) If at first you don’t succeed, do anything else that is different!

    (107) Some actions are more useful than others—they generate the outcomes I want. This is called being effective.

    I stop myself from this because it “doesn’t feel right!”—it does not correspond to the way life ‘should’ be. I call this purity —and generally I want purity!

    ‘Feeling’ has nothing to do with right or wrong; ‘shoulds’ certainly do!

    To be continued.

     

  • ¿Truths? Part 3

    Dave’s ¿Truths?

    Truth2As noted with ¿Truths? Part 1, I am choosing to offer these thoughts simply to encourage growth. I submit them simply for self-study as an example of one person’s searching — such self-study is a very powerful way to come to know yourself. The list of these truths is long and I will submit it over a number of blogs, 25-30 brief statements per posting.

    As previously noted, a comment on language: I am not an advocate of scientific materialism, the philosophic ontology that only science can address truth, and that energy-matter is the only domain of experience in the universe. I value scientific methodology highly, but the overall terminology of scientific materialism has many hidden presuppositions. As much as possible, I will identify them in these posts.

    [An apology also — sometimes the formatting offered by WordPress is very limiting! An aspect of technology that I hate is that it forces me into processes that I do not want in my life; yet the same technology offers many advantages. Thus my common statement: Technology is wonderful — when it works.]

    (52 — the ending of the previous post) What traps me most as a human being is when I assume that the story I make up is true (!), somehow more important than the facts.

    (53) Some of my beliefs are easy to identify; others are very difficult.

    I have beliefs about my environment, my behaviors, my capabilities, even beliefs about my beliefs—all of these are comparatively easy to identify and manage.

    My beliefs about who I should be (my values), about who I am (my identity), and about my identity (my faith), become progressively more difficult to identify and to manage.

    (54) Life is difficult; life is painful (I would add: sometimes!). This is the first Noble Truth of the Buddha (Truth #1 of four and I ascribe to them all). There are aspects of life that I do not want to face, and I do a lot to avoid these aspects ( usually inappropriately).

    The biggest difficulty (Truth #2) arises because, somehow as a human being, I do not want to believe that life is difficult. “Life should not be this way! Life should be easy!” I want to hold on the pleasurable, and avoid the painful. I suffer when life is not easy — “it should be easy.”

    Truth #3 is: Pain (truth #1) is inevitable; suffering (truth #2) is optional.

    (55) Maturation through life requires acceptance and discipline (Truth #4).

    The Buddhists say it somewhat different from this.

    (56) If I truly accept what life offers and am disciplined in my responses, life becomes easier—not less painful, just easier! And frequently more joyous!

    (57) Biologically, I am deeply influenced by pain/pleasure. My mind-brain is set to experience reward with the occurrence of pleasure—whatever I consider as pleasure (and possibly also reward if I avoid pain).

    In this, I have a short-term orientation to life, my source of satisfaction or my nemesis! Long-term orientation is generally more satisfying if I am seeking peace or happiness (wanting what I get). And more difficult to achieve.

    Fortunately I have choice—it come with the human mind (?brain).

    (58) What I resist will persist!

    Human beings are not helpless, only habitual.

    (59) Accepting that life is the way that it is, and authentically working for change, is a major step for creative life!

    (60) Acceptance is a very active process: it is not passive! It may not be easy, though.

    Often, I accept best when I, to the best of my ability:

    1. examine what I gain and lose from the problem,
    2. acknowledge/appreciate the positives,
    3. minimize/change the negatives, and
    4. forgive my humanness.

    (61) By discipline, I mean “doing what I need/want to do even when I do not want to do it”, usually every day.

    If I want to fly with eagles, I need to do more than play with turkeys! I need to do what is healthy for me.

    (62) Discipline is a way for me to learn about myself, and to stretch my boundaries; it is a way to look at myself in action. The disciplines that I teach (informally) are Yoga (Iyengar), Meditation (Vipassana), and Journal Writing (Progoff). There are many others; essentially they all involve a dedication to truth.

    How can I maximize the ways in which I use discipline?

    (63) What I gain from discipline is stamina, stamina to be at peace with life’s pain.

    (64) Some more definitions to consider/experience:

    Pain—                 The conscious awareness of an unpleasant experience that denotes the potential of bodily harm.

    Anxiety—   The conscious awareness of an unpleasant experience that denotes the potential of personality harm.

    Discipline— The conscious awareness of an unpleasant experience that denotes the potential of health, such that I choose the experience.

    The action of choosing needs to be experience-based, not should-based.

    (65) Discipline is not a solution; it is a tool to allow me to be still while I find other means of resolution.

    (66) Much of every-day life requires discipline in the form of delayed gratification, cleaning up mess so as to have greater satisfaction.

    Discipline allows one to do the cleanup with contentment rather than resentment.

    (67) Laziness and fearfulness trap me; “life should be easy.”

    (68) Life is not fair! It never was!

    The only thing in life that is fair is what you and I agree to accept as fair. It is then unfair when one of us breaks this agreement.

    Otherwise, life is! Each one of us is handed a different set of circumstances and issues with which to grapple, perhaps to solve.

    Optimally we agree to treat each other fairly. We get into difficulty though when we assume that this agreement exists.

    (69) My current definition of life is:

    “Life is what happens when I am planning something else.”

    (70) We are continually faced by great opportunities brilliantly disguised as insoluble problems.

    (71) It’s not so much what happens to me that matters, but how I respond!

    Sometimes the environment is toxic; more commonly I lack flexibility.

    Freedom and wisdom both depend on flexibility!

    (72) Energy is the capability of doing work, of initiating movement. Life energy, aliveness, is my inherent excitement that I bring to my life.

    Emotions occur when I give meaning and direction to my energy.

    (73) There are three fundamental “laws” that impact life energy:

    • every human being wants positive experience,
    • it is easier to get negative experience than to get positive, and
    • negative experience is better than no experience.

    (74) As simple as these laws seem, they account for much human behavior.

    (75) ‘Bitching’ and ‘being a bitch’ are not female preoccupations.

    ‘Bitching’ means to use one’s energy to complain rather than to negotiate or problem-solve, to be indirect rather than direct—it is generally an ineffective means of power, used by both men and women. It is a way to negative experience.

    Pot(76) One of the best metaphors I know for describing myself is as a pot of stew (all the stuff of my past: my values, beliefs, memories and expectations, my VBMEs), being heated on the stove by my current or recent stressors, stirred by a spoon (the current event, here now, often your behavior).

    (77) When my pot is stirred (or my buttons pushed, however you want to name this), what comes to the surface (my thoughts and feelings, my T/F) are information as to what is happening, especially information as to what is already in the pot.

    Although the process is rapid (and predominantly outside of awareness), I then choose my behavior, my responses (again, also often out of awareness).

    If I am aware, I speak of “responding”; if unaware, I “react.” In any event, my behavior then becomes the spoon for your pot! And your subsequent response becomes a further spoon for me, or someone else, and so on!

    (78) Consider, however:

    • If I were really stirring a pot of stew with a spoon, and a carrot came to the surface, would I blame the spoon for the carrot? Did the spoon make the carrot?
      • No! The spoon brought the carrot to the surface, but it did not make or cause the carrot.
      • Yet this process is what happens when I blame you for my thoughts, feelings or behavior, when I say “you made me …..”.
    • Your behavior is simply your behavior; I have no divine right to change it, or to judge it. However, I do have the right to know, to account for it, especially if I believe you intend to harm me.
      • If I feel anguish of some kind (anger, sadness, etc.) and you intend it, I wish to protect myself from you, either by leaving or by defending myself in some other way!

    (79) In order for me to react to an event (a spoon), I must perceive it (take in the information), and then make an interpretation or judgment about it, especially about its possible danger to me. Generally this is a highly primitive fight-or-flight reaction, incredibly rapid and out of awareness!

    Then I prepare my response, and my body starts to reacts, again out of awareness! This body reaction is my emotion, my body getting ready for motion.

    I have some choices and control over this process.

    (80) Reactivity is a habit! And like all habits, sustained by laziness!

    To be continued.

     

  • ¿Truths? Part 2

    Meaning2As noted with ¿Truths? Part 1, I am choosing to offer these thoughts simply to encourage growth. I submit them simply for self-study as an example of one person’s searching — it is a very powerful way to come to know yourself. The list is long and I will submit it over a number of blogs, 25-30 brief statements per posting.

    As previously noted, a comment on language: I am not an advocate of scientific materialism, the philosophic ontology that only science can address truth, and that energy-matter is the only domain of experience in the universe. I value scientific methodology highly, but the overall terminology of scientific materialism has many hidden presuppositions. As much as possible, I will identify them in these posts.

    [An apology also — sometimes the formatting offered by WordPress is very limiting! An aspect of technology that I hate is that it forces me into processes that I do not want in my life; yet, the same technology offers many advantages. Thus my common statement: Technology is wonderful — when it works.]

    1. (Continuing the previous) As part of being present, I learn skills of living.
    2. The skills fall into two main groups:
      • skills of integrity, being my word, including choosing action (pro-activity) rather than “understanding” or “reaction,” developing a vision of where I want to go and how, and being disciplined in “how” I action my vision
      • being in relationship with life, trustworthy and committed, including balancing my needs with the needs of others and being a midwife for others..
    1. All this requires that I be very clear of who I am!

    Every man has a vocation to be someone: but he must understand clearly that in order to fulfill this vocation he can only be one person: himself (Thomas Merton).

    1. My journey is not your journey. You need to do your own journey.

    The only truth I can tell you is of my journey.

    1. I can never know absolute truth; depending on circumstances, everything is true, and everything is bull. What I gain on the journey is wisdom, the knowing of my own truth! I cannot teach wisdom to anyone else.
    2. I am here now!

    This is very simple, yet very fundamental. This is the only time in which I am able to make a difference in life. What difference, if any, do I want to make at this time? Now? Here?

    1. As a biologic creature, I have all the resources I require so as to be alive, to live fully.

    I frequently wonder about this; present-day human life is very complex. Sometimes I truly do not know something, and I obtain such from another source. Such resources are invaluable to challenge me in my growth.

    However, if there is something such as universal consciousness, then perhaps all is available to me, if only I knew how.

    I certainly need integration of my resources; my society also needs integration.

    1. The following statement speaks volumes!

    “Until you can see through the rules, you can only see through the rules.” (R. D. Laing)

    1. Believing is seeing!

    Usually we say “seeing is believing;” less accurate though.

    1. I am currently doing the best that I can. Even when I believe I should be doing something else, I am still doing the best I can right now.

    I can however do something different (especially if I do not like what I am currently doing!)—I have choice!

    There is a price tag to choice!

    1. Fears are ‘Fantasied Experiences Appearing Real.’

    One of the activities I enjoy is climbing—50’-60’ in the air, suspended by a safety harness. The real risk is slight; the perceived risk is high (and exciting).

    Most of my fears are due to perceived risk! I call this fearfulness. And I need to be careful that I do evaluate the real risks!

    1. There is a major distinction between fear and fearfulness.

    ‘Fear’ is the authentic response to danger. ‘Fearfulness’ is the catastrophic response to ‘fantasized experiences appearing real.’

    Julian of Norwich, a 14th century mystic, indicated that this latter is one of the only two sins—it alienates us from life.

    1. This distinction became the basis of my PhD dissertation — the study of acedia, an ancient term that for me includes fearfulness, laziness, and self-righteousness as the fundamental emotional processes we use to avoid authentic living.
    2. Some thoughts/definitions of importance to me.
    • Power—               the ability to influence others.
    • Strength—            the ability to resist others.
    • Freedom—           the ability to influence myself.
    • Wisdom—            flexibility with craziness (yours and/or mine).
    1. I live within an environment, and I impact that environment. Even when I am doing “nothing,” I still have an impact.

    What is my impact? Do I truly want this impact?

    1. On rare occasions, I am an innocent victim of the universe (especially true of children).

    I am never one when my pain is recurrent—always I contribute to my own suffering.

    I have no power to change the universe; I do have power to change my self.

    1. Assuming there is a purpose underlying the universe (God, Creator, .Mystery, …), then there are probably no innocent victims, ever. We are given this life to live it, in all its complexity.

    There is a great freedom in accepting that I have chosen to be here.

    Yet I often wonder as to the purpose envisioned by Creator. The diversity of life is so complex, especially in the realm of good and evil.

    1. I have a purpose in being here! Even when I do not know what that purpose is, I still have a purpose. What is my purpose?

    Sometimes my purpose seems small (I want to talk to you!); sometimes my purpose seems grand (I am an instrument of Mystery!). Always I am a creature of the universe, contributing to whatever purpose resides in the universe.

    1. My time is my time! No one, absolutely no one, gets my time without my permission! I can give my time freely, or resentfully—either way, with my permission!
    2. I am an explorer. I am often happiest being an explorer. As explorer, I cannot fully know what I am exploring until I have explored it!

    Frequently, when exploring, I feel very scared.

    When I am most scared, and able to explore my scare, I find my biggest treasures.

    1. As much as possible, I seek simplicity and clarity. For me, these allow me a place to stand in the universe. What is the simple and the obvious in my life?
    2. There is a major difference between wishes and goals.

    Wishes are exciting, generally vague, and usually I can tell you why I don’t have “it” in my life, perhaps with excuses or explanations. I may also regret, or somehow create, a negative experience from this.

    Goals are planned directions, planned in that I know what I want and how to get it, what I need to do and when. The RPMS of goals are Realistic, Practical, Measurable and Specific!

    1. When I am living a goal, it is likely that I am also excited and looking forward, able to celebrate when I am finished (or having reached a significant milestone on the path). I can also change direction when necessary.

    How do I live my life, what part as wishes and as goals? Both are useful at times.

    1. “Want” does not mean that I like something; it means that “I choose” (perhaps the better of two goods, often the lesser of two evils).
    2. There are no guarantees!
    3. One of the simple concepts in life is that there are three kinds of “facts”:
    • there are external facts (outside myself—said to be objective — wow!),
    • there are my personal facts (my own internal sensations, thoughts, feelings and my behavior descriptions of what I experience outside myself), and
    • there are my interpretations of these two other facts (the story I make up about these first two types of facts).
    1. What connects these three are my beliefs. Keeping all these aspects, my facts and my beliefs, separate and manageable is an amazingly difficult process—and an incredibly rewarding one when I do so.
    2. What traps me most as a human being is when I assume that the story I make up is true (!), somehow more important than the facts.

    Also, I often keep my beliefs out-of-consciousness (so as to maintain this trap)! To step out of the trap means that I will encounter pain (and hopefully joy).

    To be continued.

  • ¿Truths? Part 1

    Questioning the truth

    More than thirty years ago, in my attempt to grasp effective change, I decided to write down my beliefs as short concise statements which could be compared with to my actual experiences, and thus validated. Thus, the following are truths for me. I speak them only as my experience, my beliefs, my values, and yet I think they are universal, independent of culture for the most part. This practice has proved to be one of the most powerful activities of my own growth. It allowed me to be clear of my own attitudes about myself and the world. Initially I revised them every few months, now every couple of years. I also live them as much as possible; they are always in revision and are not absolute.

    Now at age 76 I am undertaking a major life review and choose to offer these thoughts simply to encourage growth. I offer them simply for self-study of one person’s searching — it is a very powerful way to come to know yourself. The list is long and I will submit it over a number of blogs, perhaps 25-30 brief statements per posting.

    A comment on language: I am not an advocate of scientific materialism, the philosophic ontology that only science can address truth, and that energy-matter is the only domain of experience in the universe. I value scientific methodology highly, but the overall terminology that describes me include Gestaltist, panpsychist, and panentheist (those terms require many comments). Essentially I believe that consciousness and energy-matter are two sides of the same coin, a coin that is not yet describable (if it makes sense to you, think of wave and particle in quantum mechanics). However, most of the world is orientated to scientific materialism, and much information I value is coached in these terms. I attempt to be very precise with my language, but because of these issues, I often use somewhat strange language, and I ask patience of the reader. For example, I often speak of mind-brain, when I am not clear as to how the mind (consciousness) and brain (energy-matter) interact. I certainly do not believe they are synonymous; only that they are somehow related, and that perhaps mind is vastly more sophisticated than brain. Other examples will be explained as they occur.

    We so need to grow as a species!

    Dave’s ¿Truths?

    1. I forget these truths, frequently and repeatedly!

    The hardest thing for me to learn is what I don’t know, because I don’t know that I don’t know it!

    Frequently it is not safe for me to learn these truths—there is a price tag to truth.

    2. A major problem of our society is the loss of the subjective.

    Objectivity provides great technology, and only limited humanity.

    3. There is an old engineering principle that states: “If it works, use it.” Very practical!

    One corollary is “If your conclusions are wrong, examine your premises.” When my conclusions about life are wrong, I may need to examine my assumptions.

    Similarly, “If your conclusions are right, don’t trust your premises.” Life is an ongoing process of exploration in which I am repeatedly encountering new wonders (and terrors).

    4. What I have gained in my life, especially from childhood, is a map of life.

    The map is not the territory!

    5. Life comes as a complete package, a territory, not a map, and includes subjectivity, objectivity, diversity, community, decay, rejuvenation, … (perhaps this is just our dramatic dualistic way of experiencing).

    I am not in charge! Dualism may be an inherent component in the universe. Witness right-handed and left-handed amino acids, and our biologic preferences.

    However, consciousness does not need to be dualistic (right/wrong, good/bad, et cetera). Perhaps consciousness is fully non-dual.

    6. Each of us is unique! We have many similarities, yet we each have unique maps, similar but not the same.

    No two people understand the same situation (any situation, any sentence, any object, any smell, et cetera) in the same manner. We frequently delude ourselves that we do!

    When I truly validate this difference, the consequences are staggering!

    7. There is much evidence that life is painful (sometimes); there is no evidence that life is serious.

    Being able to play with what life offers is a major skill, and part of maturity.

    8. Another major skill of maturity is the ability to know when to be silent!

    And preferably in awe of whatever is occurring.

    9. The most successful person in the world is the one who is having the most fun.

    In my experience, I do not compare when I am having fun! I simply have fun! Everything is included and integrated when I am having fun; there are no divisions.

    10. Human beings are fundamentally playful, if allowed to be so. Our integrity seeks authentic feel-good experiences.

    If a new, authentically more effective pattern can be experienced in place of an older less effective pattern, we will change rapidly and permanently. Invariably this new pattern has an authentic feel-good character. Integration of the change within our lives, and our emotional systems, may require considerable time.

    11. There are two basic processes available in creating change: choice and playfulness.

    Choice involves deciding how we want to live, given our options, moving in that direction. There will be consequences, and hence a price tag to our choices.

    Playfulness is available as a skill so as to create authentic more effective patterns within our choices, generally improving the cost/benefit ratio of the price tag. Often playfulness requires challenge of the existing system.

    12. When I am in pain (or suffering), I need to examine my map; when I am comfortable, I need to be careful with my map.

    What limits me is my ability (or inability) to say “yes” to what life offers—the territory! not the map!

    13. Please do not trap me in the limitations of your map.

    It is extremely painful to get caught in your interpretation of me when that interpretation does not reflect my reality, and you do not have a way to step back from our/your reality to assess the data.

    Certainly at a personal level, it is the most painful experience of my life, and at a societal level, I think it is probably our most common emotional problem. one in which people have great difficulty letting go of their maps.

    14. The basis of our humanness seems to reside in our brains (see next comment).

    Our brains are built in three evolutionary stages: the brain of a lizard (fundamental survival), the brain of a mammal (emotion, including love and play), and a human brain (clarity and choice, the ability to deal with the complexity of  time and meaning).

    15. However, consciousness is not necessarily restricted to our brain.

    I often wonder what is the connection between mind and brain. As a physician, I know that I lose the ability to access the consciousness of an individual when they have major brain injury, but that does not mean that consciousness exists within the brain. The brain need only be an access portal.

    The nature of near-death experiences suggests that there may be other portals.

    16. I have limitations. I am not God (whatever that term means); I cannot do everything.

    I have choice though. I have the beginning of awareness, and I can develop my awareness further. I can also play.

    I can love, or I can fear. When I fear, I call the other a problem—and I have pain. If I then say “this should not be,” then I suffer.

    17. I have a set of beliefs. The purpose of beliefs is to link one experience to another. Somehow, as a human being, I believe that my beliefs are more important than what I experience. Wow!

    Many of my beliefs are “shoulds!” Wow again! This is principally how I drive myself crazy (or at least neurotic)! It is also how I drive others crazy.

    18. Much of my experience is grounded in biology.

    One of my favorite stories is how to catch crabs in the ocean. Put a large open box (a big box), partially filled with bait, on the ocean floor. The crabs (10-20 crabs) will climb into the box, and eat the bait. Then, when the bait is all gone, the crabs will keep each other in the box—they won’t let each other leave. If persistent, they will kill the crab that wants to leave by tearing its claws off. Biologists call it ‘the togetherness factor’.

    Wow! How we ‘should’ each other.

    19. Other experiences that I have had are grounded in something else.

    In particular, I have been graced with occasional profound mystical experiences. I do not know how to ground these in biology. Perhaps they are simply a survival mechanism for responding to existential loneliness.

    20. When is enough? A huge question!

    For me, ‘enough’ means that I have what I need for adequate comfort, and a bit more for occasional luxuries.

    21. What I experience, and what I value (peace, community, et cetera), are far better guides to life and its richness than what I believe.

    In my experience, do I achieve my values? If not, what am I valuing instead?

    22. I am on a journey, this phase of which begins with conception, and ends with death. The journey is one of growth to be a mature human being, whatever that means. Essentially, it means to be present to life.

    23. The word “present” has multiple meanings, a triple entendre!

    it means to be here,

    it refers to now, and

    it is also a gift to be opened!

    24. Are you present? Am I present?

    25. As part of being present, I learn skills of living. The skills are not the journey, merely the tools of the journey. Being in action of my own truths is one of the skills; in particular, I value this process.

    To be continued.

  • Issues Of Insanity

    Insanity Sanity Signpost Shows Crazy Or Psychologically SoundI’ve recently returned from Ontario, where I was presenting two workshops on Authenticity (what it means, and how to be authentic — the work required); both were well received. For me, they also illustrated the huge desire and need for people to be authentic, as well as how little teaching there is in our society regarding emotional maturity.

    Question: how often have you gone to a workshop that emphasizes emotional growth, or resolving relationship issues? My guess is that, for most people, the answer is: Never!

    The preceeding centuries, at least since the 18th century, have emphasized technology and consumerism, all fueled by scientific materialism and especially by neoliberalism — great for industry, but not a good combination for health, especially emotional health. For me, they are a sad reflection on the path of human development.

    As I emphasized on one slide of the workshop, our history has been that of hunter-gatherers for hundreds of thousands of years. As such, many of these societies have been incredibly healthy, perhaps our oldest true immediate democracies. Then we had the beginning of agriculture, with the introduction of civilization. And empire, including slavery. With the Greeks, we had the identification of democracy and the valuing of wisdom. And eventually feudalism, and functional slavery. With the Renaissance, we had science and the valuing of the individual. And industrial slavery. With the 20th century, we had technology and the valuing of women. And consumerism (and perhaps commercial slavery). Now with the 21st century, we have the information revolution and the valuing of diversity. And global warming (and The Climate Lie). Such a strange path we humans have lived.

    So now we are reaping the costs of this path. Some examples follow.

    The insanity of politics

    Mr. Mueller Is Following the Money (20170615)

    A rather crude article, but it hits all the sore points of this insanity of politics.

    Comey’s testimony was a media disaster for Trump. These headlines prove it. (20170609)

    The responses to Comey’s testimony.

    Cashing in on the Rise of the Alt-Right (20170616)

    The destruction of political norms started decades ago. Here’s how it happened. (20170618)

    The strange nature of our society, as it becomes more and more polarized.

    WTF is going on in the UK? (20170609)

    Strange politics is also part of other areas of the world.

    On global warmingAntarcticMelt

    Scientists stunned by Antarctic rainfall and a melt area bigger than Texas (20170615)

    A potential harbringer of the future.

    New Solar Milestone Has Big Consequences (20170606)

    Progress is slow, but ongoing.

    On the positive side:

    Defiance of Trump spawns international workarounds with U.S. states, cities (20170609)

    A good summary of Trump issues.

    How to Fight Trump’s Paris withdrawal by taking climate justice into our own hands (20170613)

    A good article on local action regarding the off-loading of consumer costs, and the possibility of legal challenge — a slow, but necessary, step in a more mature process.

    Protecting oceans is paying off (20170608)

    Fascinating research.

    Accepting One’s Quirky Personality (2017)

    Jack Kornfield often has brief but intersting comments of living with the insanity. My own stance is that we need much greater emphasis and availability of teaching on how to do this work. Otherwise such articles simply become another ‘should’ of how we should live.

    We are such an interesting species! (A reminder of the Chinese curse: May you live in interesting times!)

  • Authenticity (Daily Living, Part 8)

    In a mature culture, all would contribute authenticity.
    In a mature culture, all would contribute authenticity.

    Daily life in a mature culture — the last posting I painted a picture of major uniformity. I suggest that this is necessary so as to keep the human impact to a minimum, and that such life could still be very satisfying, although the emphasis would be on authenticity, as compared to becoming more competitive in the marketplace.

    So what else about living under these conditions? First, some loose ends (which could become major postings if expanded).

    • Home and work life
    • Guaranteed resources: health, nutrition, education, child care
    • Stuff? We have too much stuff

    Home and Work Life would both be based upon community interaction. Given robotics and electronic communication, much of work life could actually be performed within the “village” settings.

    • Then, if desired, external work interaction would be by choice. For example, food production by extensive local gardening might well be performed because people actually wanted to engage with the soil.
    • Much industrial productivity would be automated, but there would still be many tasks that required direct interaction, especially in the development of new technology that had not previously been explored.
      • The automated productivity would be relegated to products that no longer needed innovation. For example, how many brands of toothpaste are really needed? (Yet go into any modern “drugstore” and you will find dozens if not hundreds of brands. What nonsense!)

    Many aspects of community life would be guaranteed.

    • The provision of nutrition and health care will be universal.
    • Education in the future will be universal, and must emphasize personal development, especially the development of wisdom and governance.
      • Historically education has emphasized skill development, especially the transcribing of religious texts, and has been restricted to only certain societal groups.
      • In general as well, human beings are experiential learners, with age-appropriate processing to an experience so as to learn from it. What seems to work best is to have a brief exposure to a problem, engage in a physical experience related to resolving the problem, study the outcome (especially since first attempts are seldom successful at resolution), and then further engagement in problem solving (until resolution).
    • Child care would be guaranteed. In particular, we must find ways to optimize child care.
      • It is becoming well-recognized that early child development, especially in relationship to attachment needs, is central to the development of healthy adults (healthy both physically and mentally). We can no longer afford the erratic child care provisions of our modern society where we expect young parents, struggling with a multitude of issues, to provide effective child development on top of their other stresses.
      • Sorenson (1998), in Preconquest Consciousness, emphasizes how “groups of people can be simultaneously individualistic and collective — traits immiscible and incompatible in modern thought” (p. 82), but at the same time he noted how such cultures shrivel “with alarming speed when faced with harsh emotions and coercion” (p. 80), traits common to our current society.

    Stuff? We have too much stuff.

    • A huge aspect of modern life is the provision of stuff for consumption, with little attention to the actual cost of production and the cost of the garbage created when the stuff is outmoded.
      • We cannot afford this! Everything in a future world must be recyclable.
      • Given our population density, we cannot afford garbage on a finite planet.
    • I suspect that if a society truly valued appropriate productivity, most of what we “consume” would be provided free as modular recyclable units, standardized to fit the needs of the product, efficiently designed for long-term usage.
      • A small aspect of productivity could then be applied to two areas:
        • innovative development of truly new products
        • creative development of individual artistic products.
      • when people moved (from job to job for example, or for educational training), they would simply take their clothes and their artistic products with them, and leave the rest to the next occupant.
        • The status associated with “new, improved” would not be part of the cultural milieu.

    Your thoughts? (Remember, my musings are only intended to stimulate thinking about what really matters to a mature culture.)

    Coming next: Interactions between communities

  • Living in A Mature Culture, Part 7

    Glitzy and exciting, but  urban sprawl has major disadvantages.
    Glitzy and exciting, but urban sprawl has major disadvantages.

    Daily life in a mature culture — now that we have looked at the possibility of a Victory City, what would daily life actually be like in such a city? As noted, I am proposing that the high-rise buildings would consist of a large number of village-like settings, where people would actually live much of their day-to-day activity.

    A reminder: these postings are simply my thoughts on what it would be like to live permanently in a mature culture; I present them mainly to stimulate your thoughts.

    • Each “village” would consist of three floors within a high-rise complex, each complex perhaps holding approximately 30 “villages.”
      • As such, there would be a communal living floor sandwiched in two floors of private living/sleeping quarters.
        • Much would be modular, both for efficiency and minimal environmental impact.
      • Most food preparation and eating would be within the communal space, or in more central cafeteria-style buildings within the city.
        • There would be an emphasis that such food be both nutritious and of very high quality (not at all like the typical cafeteria of modern life).
      • Each village would consist of about 200 people, likely about 50 families, interacting with each other. There would be about 125 adults (including late teens), and about 75 younger children.
        • There would be extensive day-care facilities for child care (approximately 25 per village, or 625 per high-rise); essentially the village would raise the children, and children would be able to attend every process of village life.
        • school-aged children (approximately 2000 per high-rise) would attend school in the high-rise common area.
        • late teens would attend some kind of college or university, of which there would be 5 – 10 in the city, with the possibility of outreach to other cities.
      • The “adults” would meet several times per week in small groups, perhaps 10 people each, for personal development. Each week, there would also be a variety of local governance groups planning the needs and development of the village community, and a number of meetings with other groups outside the “village,” planning governance on a broader level.
        • The adults would be engaged in work activity 25 hours per week, 5 hours per day, approximately half of which would be virtual meetings or some kind of activity that could be performed without leaving the local village.
          • Children of all ages would be welcome at all activities.
        • Given that the cultural narrative would be that of a permanent state of sustainability, then perhaps most of adult life would be lived out in these environment.
          • We would no longer live the current cultural model of continuous improvement and discovery (such living is not compatible with being the dominant species of a finite planet).

    Your thoughts? Would this be too commune-like? Would this be too sterile? Both Rupert Ross (Dancing With A Ghost) and Louis Herman (Future Primal) have a lot to say about this.

    Ross, when reflecting on “primitive” native culture, notes (pp. 103-108):

    Each generation’s turn at the wheel might include performances better or worse than the last, but they would be essentially the same performance, with the same set and script and plotting. . . .

    We post-industrial societies, in contrast, seem to run a cross-country relay race, passing the baton to a generation that will never set foot upon the ground we have covered . . .

    There is a temptation to conclude that such a repetitive existence would be boring in the extreme, that it would feel binding and imprisoning.

    I suspect . . .  no such sense of limits. . . . they [native peoples] may have perceived their lives as holding a virtually limitless scope for challenge and accomplishment. . . .  their lives did not center on building things, but upon discerning things. Life’s challenge lay in observing and understanding the workings of the dynamic equilibrium of which they were a part, then acting so as to sustain a harmony within it rather than a mastery over it. One aspired to wisdom in accommodating oneself

    . . . they sought that wisdom not only to better ensure survival but also as an end in itself, as something in itself exhilarating.

    Herman notes (Kindle location 7130):

    Our wilderness origins fashioned our creative self-consciousness, which is both expanded and balanced by following the primal dynamic: face-to-face communication within a caring community of individuals, passionate for living and learning in a mutually enhancing resonance with the natural world. This is the truth quest, and it is our primal inheritance. We can ignore it, or we can cultivate it in all our endeavors and bring it into a creative engagement with the reality we find ourselves caught up in: a civilization rushing to self-destruction while displaying tantalizing possibilities of a more beautiful, joyful way of life.

    As a therapist of 25 years’ experience, centered largely in my own emotional growth, I know that exhilaration. Personally, although such “village” life as I am describing would have challenges, it could also be immensely satisfying.

    To be continued.

  • Acedia and Evil

    The desire to give up! Caught in despair.
    The desire to give up! Caught in despair.

    I’ve been reading some of the articles accessible through The Climate Mobilization website, especially those concerning what we are now learning about the risks of global warming, even at our current level. It is so much worse than I thought! And I regard myself as well-informed in this area. For me, the issues are so related to the acedia of our civilization.

    Gradually we are shifting. More and more leaders are speaking out for the need for profound change. However, all that leaders can do is lead! It is followers that create the bulk of the change. We need the majority of our culture to speak out.

    And there is some evidence that the cultural majority are aware of this need. Recent research suggests that 54% of people in four Western countries acknowledge high risk of our civilization ending, and 24% recognize the risk of human extinction, all in the next 100 years.

    Acedia and Evil

    In this post I want to finish with the topic of acedia, in particular the nature of evil.

    In The Hope: A Guide To Sacred Activism, Andrew Harvey tells the story of a major agribusiness CEO who knew exactly what destruction he was causing to the lives of thousands of people, but proceeded anyway simply for the sense of power that it gave him. When I reflect on modern tragedies such as

    • the duplicity of British Petroleum in the 2010 Gulf environmental disaster,
    • ExxonMobil being aware of the impact of fossil fuel on global warming in the 1970s, and deliberately hiding this information (presumably for profit to the company),
    • the Koch brothers’ massive manipulation of the American political system,
    • and many other political-economic-environmental disasters of recent years,

    I cannot but consider these actions as evil — the active antagonism of what life offers, the hiding for political-economic power. Such actions must be identified, and stopped, but there is the danger of focusing on these issues, rather than looking at the system (the Cultural Lie, including myself as part to this system) which allows such actions to develop.

    The Banality of Acedia and Evil

    I also know from Hannah Arendt’s work on the banality of evil and Milgram’s work on obedience to authority, that the possibility of evil is a fundamental human characteristic. I consider evil as the end-point of the spectrum of acedia, as shown in the accompanying diagram. The manifestations of acedia (self-righteousness, laziness, fearfulness) are not evil per se, but they set the stage for evil, especially the acceptance of evil acts by others, wherein acedia displays as an attitude of “it doesn’t matter,” “who cares?,” or “it can’t be helped.”

    AcediaSpectrum1

    Yet the fundamental difficulty of evil is the attempt to eliminate evil — it sets a false dichotomy of us against them, and if only we eliminate them, things will be fine. When we as individuals fail to recognize how our silence and/or tokenism in the Climate Lie perpetuates the system, we support the evil of actions such as above.

    As a culture, we have enjoyed the benefits of technology, and have been unwilling to recognize or pay the costs. We live gross inequality, with massive world poverty (amidst conclaves of richness), extensive hunger (especially starvation of  children), mistreatment of minorities (especially women in underdeveloped countries), waste and pollution (our garbage accumulates), amongst other inequities. We live the acedia cycle, especially in our lack of charity in resolving these issues. We have extensive “charitable organizations,” yet as a culture we lack the charity to resolve these  difficulties.

    So what to do? Most of the power is held by those who are creating the inequality, mainly the leaders of the multi-national corporations. (Likely only a small minority of these corporations — I presume most are honorable, but we must find a way through so as to disempower those that create the most disruption of equitable society. And in any event, I am not interested in created the us versus them dilemma.)

    The Need for Civil Disobedience

    Gier (2006), in Three Principles of Civil Disobedience: Thoreau, Gandhi, and  King, notes that effective civil disobedience requires that:

    • one maintain respect for the rule of law even while disobeying the specific law perceived as unjust;
    • one should plead guilty to any violation of the law; and
    • one should attempt to convert the opponent by demonstrating the justice of one’s

    I believe that civil disobedience is the only route that we can take. To engage in evil to combat evil will not lead to a mature culture. We have made attempts, such as the Occupy movement, but they need to continue.

    Are we worthy of being a mature culture? I hope so.

  • Emotional Management (especially Anger and Rage)

    Emotional Management, especially Anger and Rage

    As part of my commitment to social change, I offer this free program on Anger Management. There is a huge amount of anger in our culture, some overt but mostly hidden. — it is the ‘canary in the coal mine’ of the pain and dysfunction of our society.  It is only by managing our own lives that we will be able to respond to the difficult days ahead.

    I originally offers this set of posts as a free email program for anger management; subsequently, I placed it here on my blog as as to be available to anyone interested. The information and tasks are suitable for any emotional issue. Simply use your own issue whenever anger is mentioned. If you want personal work, I am still available for coaching.

    Please go to Postings > Anger Management for the complete series: a set of 30 ’emails’, each with a brief concept and a simple task allowing exploration of the importance of the concept.

    If you want individual coaching, let me know via this email link:

    Angry? How to change your life in 90 days.

    (I originally sent this out as part of the email program.)

    Hi.

    Thanks for showing interest in the Angry? Change your life in 90 days program.

    First of all, let me congratulate you for showing this interest. As I reflect on the state of our current world, I am surprised that so few people are willing to admit how angry they are. Recall all the stories of road rage, the frequent mass shootings, and other forms of anger — these are instances that show what is happening to us as a culture, of how angry we really are as a people. But it must be the other guy, right?

    In my own case, I grew up in a family in which alcoholism was rampant, and for me, childhood was an extremely painful affair. (I suggest that anger is a major component of alcoholism; one of these days I will do a post on that to my blog.) Yet for most of my early adult life I was not aware of how angry I was. It was only when I got into my 40s that I was able to acknowledge this to myself. That is long past for me, although I do remain angry with the insanity of our culture — that has created (and for the most part currently denies) the issues of global warming. The major difference though is that I am not caught in my anger.

    Be that as it may, this program is not about global warming. It is about how to work through your issues of anger, so as to achieve the kind of life you want to live:

    • how to recognize when you are angry,
    • how to be more peaceful, living the Serenity Prayer, and
    • how to have better relationships, amongst other components.

    And, as opposed to my usual writings, it is not about understanding anger, nor why you are angry — overall, that kind of understanding is the booby prize. This program, this set of emails, is about skill development, and what to do, not what to think.

    The program will provide you with 30 emails over approximately 90 days, one email twice a week, usually Mondays and Thursdays. Why 90 days? Well, two of my previous mentors, both world-class therapists, indicated that change requires approximately three months of consistent application (one said three months, the other 13 weeks!) — after 25 years of practice in my own practice, this is also my own experience.

    Can this really change your life, for the better? Absolutely. I am not saying that everything will be fine in 90 days; I am saying that in 90 days, you can be consistently moving in a new direction, one where the light at the end of the tunnel is not just another train.

    Be aware it will take work, probably at least an hour a day, perhaps more. And it may bring up a lot of pain — after all, you are angry for many good reasons, and your anger likely protects you from this pain. But at the same time, I do not intend it to be too onerous — you won’t do it if it is. I strongly believe that people learn best when they are having fun; thus, I will do my best to keep it light. Still — it will require effort.

    If you desire, I am available for coaching,
    and I still require you to work through this material.

    So, are you still interested? If you are, click the following link, and send me an email ([email protected]) or give me a call (604-725-4707). Predominantly I work with people over Zoom so distance is not an obstacle. We can discuss what you want and, as part of our conversation, my fees. I’m open to negotiation largely because I seek a more healthy society, not a focus on income. Still there is the adage: ‘You get what you pay for.’

    Not sure? Check out a sample.

    You are welcome to print these ’emails’, and use them in any way you wish. If you pass them onto others, my only request is attribution. If useful, I can provide a Word document or pdf to allow easy printing. Simply let me know your need.

    Note also that, in these emails, there will be occasional attachments, and links to my blog. Mainly these will provide diagrams that I believe you will find useful in understanding the tasks (the diagrams will also be in the Word document), but the separate image files may be of some use to you also. Simple emails are not a good way of sending such information, so look out for them please.